Your Self-concept Generates Everything: Wealth, Abundance, Love, Relationships...

Consciousness vs Spirituality — Which One Is Actually Closer to God?

Neuroscience cannot explain consciousness. Spirituality claims to. But what if consciousness is not the product of the brain — what if it is the ground of everything, including God?

Tal

5/7/20263 min read

sun rays over clouds and mountains
sun rays over clouds and mountains

Here is the question nobody in church asks, and nobody in the neuroscience lab wants to answer.

If God is real — not as doctrine, not as institution, not as the managed version handed to you in childhood — but as the actual ground of existence, the living intelligence underneath reality itself — then which gets you closer to it? The spiritual practice you inherited? Or the raw, unmediated fact that you are aware right now, reading these words, with no explanation for why that awareness exists at all?

This is not a rhetorical question. It is the most serious question in both science and religion, and neither field has answered it honestly.

Start with what neuroscience actually knows about consciousness — which is, embarrassingly, almost nothing. The hard problem of consciousness, articulated by philosopher David Chalmers, asks a question that has stopped the most sophisticated brains in science cold: why does neural activity — electrochemical signals firing across synaptic gaps — produce subjective experience? Why does the brain not simply process information in the dark, as a calculator does, producing outputs with no inner felt quality? Why is there something it is like to be you?

No one knows. Not even approximately. Despite significant advances in cognitive neuroscience, this explanatory gap remains unresolved. Consciousness — the very medium through which experience arises — continues to resist capture within strictly reductive or materialist paradigms.

This is not a gap that more research will eventually close. It is a structural problem. The tools science uses to study the world are made of consciousness. You cannot use the thing to explain the thing. The microscope cannot examine itself.

Now enter the most provocative proposal currently circulating in peer-reviewed psychology. A 2025 paper published in Frontiers in Psychology — not a spiritual blog, an academic journal — argues precisely this: consciousness is not a byproduct of brain activity but rather ontologically fundamental — not an emergent property of neural processes, but the foundational reality from which mind and matter arise.

Read that slowly. The brain does not produce consciousness. Consciousness produces — or precedes — everything, including the brain.

This is not new as a spiritual claim. Advaita Vedanta, one of the world's oldest philosophical traditions, has insisted for millennia that Brahman — the divine ground of being — is infinite consciousness itself. Not a being who is conscious. Consciousness is the fundamental nature of reality. Vedanta is one of the world's most ancient spiritual philosophies, with a belief in Brahman, the divine ground of being, who is infinite existence and infinite consciousness.

What is new is that academic philosophy and transpersonal psychology are arriving, through entirely different routes, at the same address.

So where does this leave spirituality — the practices, the prayers, the rituals, the seeking?

Here is the distinction that matters. Spirituality is the road. Consciousness is the destination — and also the vehicle, and also the traveler, and also the ground the road is built on. Most spiritual practice is trying to arrive somewhere that you never actually left. The mystics in every tradition knew this. The Sufi speaks of fana — dissolution of the self into God. The Christian contemplative speaks of union. The Buddhist speaks of the recognition of Buddha-nature already present. Every genuine mystical tradition and religion points to the same thing:

You are not trying to find consciousness. You are consciousness, temporarily convinced it is something smaller.

But conscious of what?

  • The same attributes in God are in you. You are the highest representation of him.

  • You are one with the Universe.

  • Only from you, the Universe is reflected into people, circumstances, events...

The person who practices spirituality without examining consciousness is following a map. The person who examines consciousness directly — who sits with the raw fact of awareness itself and asks what it actually is — is standing on the territory the map was drawn from.

Neither is wrong. But only one gets you all the way there.

God, if the word means anything worth meaning, is not hiding behind the right ritual. Consciousness is the very ground of being — a co-creative force in the unfolding of reality.

You have never been outside of it. Not once. Not for a single moment of your entire life.

The question is not whether you can find it. The question is whether you are finally willing to stop looking away.